Your clients compete. Their data cannot mingle.
As a fGC, you're holding confidential information for multiple companies at the same time — sometimes direct competitors. Sapphire Legal is the only legal platform architected with real per-tenant isolation and a locally-hosted AI.
- Quick answer
- How does Sapphire Legal keep competing clients' data isolated?
- Sapphire Legal gives each client firm its own database, its own document storage, and a private legal AI that runs on our own AWS infrastructure — never on OpenAI or any third-party provider. Each client's data lives in a different place from every other client, not in a shared database with a tenant ID column. The AI that drafts contracts and analyzes calls is hosted locally, so prompts and responses never leave our environment. Privileged client call transcripts are locked behind a attorney review step that's recorded in an audit log. This is the only architecture that holds up when your clients are competitors.
Isolation is the foundation, not a feature.
Most multi-tenant software puts all clients in one database and relies on code to keep them apart. That's fine for a CRM. It's not fine when your clients compete with each other. Here's how Sapphire Legal is different.
Per-tenant database
Every client firm gets its own database — not a shared table with a tenant column, but a separate database entirely. Data cannot leak between clients because it doesn't live in the same place to begin with.
Per-tenant storage
Each client's documents are stored in an isolated location with encryption at rest. Optional dedicated storage buckets are available for clients whose compliance team wants physical separation.
Private legal AI in AWS
The AI that drafts your documents and analyzes your calls runs on our own infrastructure inside AWS. It's not a thin wrapper around OpenAI or Anthropic. Your client data never leaves our environment.
Privileged calls stay privileged — and we can prove it.
Upload a client-call recording to Sapphire Clarity and it becomes searchable, structured legal intelligence. When the call is marked legally privileged, the resulting transcript is locked behind an explicit review step. A attorney has to confirm they've reviewed the material before anyone else on the team can open it — and that review is logged with name, timestamp, and justification.
If privilege is ever challenged, you have a defensible audit trail showing exactly who accessed what and when.
- Attorney review required before transcript access
- Audit log with reviewer name + timestamp
- Privileged flag persists across exports
- Access can be revoked at any time
- Conflict check runs automatically on intake
Need the technical deep-dive?
If your clients' security team wants the full architecture diagram — database isolation, token verification, audit logging, the whole thing — we have it ready. Book a demo and we'll send it over before the call.